DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2496
CRS
Docket No: 3504-13
17 December 2013
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 4 December 2013. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you served on active duty in the Navy from
6 July 2001 to 28 January 2005, when you were discharged by
reason of misconduct, due to the commission of a serious
offense, with a general discharge. You were assigned a reentry
code of RE-4, as required by governing directives.
As your present reentry code is correct, and you have not
demonstrated that it would be in the interest of justice for the
Board to assign a more favorable code, there is no basis for
granting your request. Accordingly, your application has been
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
The Board did not consider whether your characterization of
service or reason for separation should be changed, since you
have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to
the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). You may do so by
submitting the attached DD Form 293 to the NDRB.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Vo Week
W. DEAN PF
Executive Divettor
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4379 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies, After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8265 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board did not consider whether to upgrade your discharge or change the reason for separation because you did not request such action, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07755 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 January 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3315-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval — Records, sitting in executive session, considered your. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ,Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official ‘naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3615 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5S. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official- naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR0353 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2013. the interest of justice for the Board to assign a more favorable code, there is no basis for granting your request. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate’ the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR968 13
The Board did not consider your request to upgrade your discharge and change your narrative reason for separation because you have not exhausted your administrative remedy of applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2013. On 16 February 2011, you were discharged with a general characterization of service due to unsatisfactory...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 03520-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 February 2013. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR637 13
You waived your procedural right to have your case heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB). However, the Board concluded that your reentry code should not be changed due to your misconduct and non-recommendation for reenlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4388-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2013. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.